The topic of offshore companies today have captured almost everyone and has superseded a more important event. In our opinion, the theme is somewhat inflated and is served in a strange form.
Most commentators put a priori the sign of equality between offshore and corruption and further their reasoning is built on this Foundation. However, this design is wrong by definition.
In fact, offshore is a tool that by itself can be neither good nor bad. Its essence boils down to the fact that in some place a statutory absence payment designer taxes for businesses that are registered there. If so, then there is no control over the profit margin of the company. There is generally no fiscal authorities, and all obligations of the company limited to the annual payment of a symbolic amount.
Offshore is usually situated either on the island or in the micro. So, we found that the place of registration of the company does not pay taxes, and then does not violate local laws. Roughly speaking, to the offshore in General can not be no questions. These enterprises usually operate in the form of strips in the import-ekspoteh operations. Let's say that the Ukrainian firm found the gasoline is imported at a price of 10 UAH. She brought him to Ukraine, paid customs duties, and adds its profit to UAH 10, who paid the manufacturer. This profit falls instantly under enormous press of taxation when more than 50% will be withdrawn in the form of various overcame. Plus to this, the profit margin will give rise to the regulatory authorities to turn out his pockets under the table. They know how to do. The result is a situation akin to Soviet-surplus-appropriation system, when the peasants seized the bread almost under the net. Now we can easily criticize the Bolsheviks for their total robbery, but do not pay attention to what is happening now about the same. Neither Ukrainian government didn't even think to considerably reduce with a producers the burden of taxation, but they find means to tighten the noose.
If you stupidly do not pay taxes are guaranteed to go to jail, because now the banks, notaries and other officials, are obliged to lay all the suspicious movement of individuals and legal entities. tellingly, not once, not twice, conducted research on thresholds of the aggregate tax burden. All researchers agree, it's pretty easy and honestly paid taxes, when the tax rate does not exceed 20%. After 30% of the mass tax evasion, and when it reaches 50% of the business goes underground or to other countries.
As we have seen, the government of Ukraine is actively and consistently promoting it unbearable conditions of taxation. No one in their right mind and memory will not work in the conditions of permanent robbery. You objected, citing the same example of Sweden, with a very high level of taxation, but there was consensus of society and the state. It is that society sees how and where their taxes are spent. Everything is transparent and allows the society to withdraw huge amounts in taxes to maintain what is called "Swedish socialism". That is, society is willing to pay for the high social standards. Where spending money our government we are experiencing a worsening of their own accounts, palaces and other attributes of luxury life that they built only for themselves, but to the taxpayer money. Here there can not be consensus. Every businessman is looking for a legal way to not pay taxes.
Here and go to the stage of offshore. The scheme works just. The same petrol at UAH 10. the entrepreneur buys from the manufacturer on behalf of the offshore strip. There he exposes the maximum profit and the same imports of gasoline in Ukraine but at the price of 20 UAH. And sells it almost at no extra charge. That is, in Ukraine it operates without a profit and does not violate the law. Another thing is that for such schemes should be the constant in the law niche for the products that mere mortals cannot keep. Hence the conclusion. Almost all Ukrainian businessmen, which will be able to remember, have their own company-strip.
The result is that the main burden of taxes being pulled by those who cannot afford these offshore and multimillionaires pay almost nothing. It is a monstrous injustice points to anyone who Loots his country. Moreover, if the total tax would have been reduced to sane extent Ukraine would become a prosperous country, where it would be convenient to conduct business and where to invest. However, such issues are not even considered. The tax pressure only increases, and this inevitably leads either to death or to an explosion.
Large businesses are unwilling to play by the same rules as all other citizens of their own country. This is fundamentally not fair, but there is no crime here.
From this stems a further feature of the present "PanAmSat". Panama offshore traces $2 billion citizen of Putin and somewhere there's a trace of money Poroshenko. Next – mingled horses and people in Hollywood. Lost the whole point of the event and violated the principle of separation of flies and cutlets. Simplified it looks like this.
Poroshenko long before the presidency was a major employer. If so, then he Mazan one world with Ahmetbeyli, Ponukame and other. All of them have guaranteed the inclusion of a mechanism for "optimizing revenues" from offshore shoulder. How would it not look ugly, but it does not go to any with eyes, that caught Putin! This figure never officially a business not engaged, and if so, he may not be offshore. There is nothing to optimize! But if offshore left such a sum of money, it shows the complete fiction of tax returns, ego, the false allegations of a meager property, and about whatever he's talking. That is, he was caught by the hand in direct and immediate looting of the Treasury, through abuse of official position.
Moreover, this fact already gives documented confirmation of what we wrote back in September of last year (http://slavaukraine.net/en/news/latest-news/3292-operation-the-count-of-monte-cristo-or-where-putin-s-money-part-1-part-2.html) when estimated Putin's personal fortune at $250 billion We were not alone in the order of numbers because the other day about the same said the head of investment Fund Hermitage Capital bill Browder during своего интервью CNN, when he stated that the President of Russia Vladimir Putin has a fortune of $200 billion.
For this reason, we believe that in this case, should not be mixed with warm white.
Source: http://defence-line.org/
«СЛАВА УКРАЇНІ»МБФ «GLORY TO UKRAINE»ICF «GLOIRE À L'UKRAINE»FIB «СЛАВА УКРАИНЕ»МБФ
